From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-03 16:10:53
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Btw, I kind of like "decayed" for a name.
It occurred to me that decayed falls into the "transformations between types"
category, and so should be in the imperative for consistency with the other
transformations: decay<T>::type.
Jonathan