From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-01 16:15:46
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:41AE1469.543AD33E_at_tid.es...
> I hope I made myself clear. The problem is not particular
> to multi_index_containers, it'll also pop up in any situation involving
> pointers to elements in a container.
If you guarentee that the container itself is always serialized before your
indices, then de-serialization of the indices would automatically be reduced
to providing the original (tracked) pointer. In such a case, I would think
the whole isse would never appear and that the implementation would be very
straight forward.
Robert Ramey