From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-05 06:16:33
> It has been suggested to me that it would be better (for other reasons) to
> mark individual member functions as exported rather than marking whole
> classes. Would that also help in this situation? I haven't looked closely
> yet, but if the individual member functions of the thread classes are
> exported then this warning may no longer be generated.
>
> Would there be any problems with changing to this approach?
Is it supported by all compilers that use __declspec(dllexport)? What
happens on 64-bit platforms, do we have different class layouts for exported
and non-exported classes (like we used to on Win-16)? I'm assuming that
there is some kind of logic for the warning being issued in the first place,
or maybe not?
John.