Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [serialization] problem withboost/serialization/is

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-04 09:49:28

Next message: Vukasin Toroman: "Re: [boost] Re: recursive mutex and condition"
Previous message: Michael Glassford: "[boost] Re: surprising accessability of free locking functions for mutex"
In reply to: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] [serialization] problem with boost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
Next in thread: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [serialization]problemwithboost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
Reply: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [serialization]problemwithboost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> The code is *incorrectly* using __MSVC_VER where it should use
> _MSVC_VER (just one leading underscore).

_MSC_VER.

Next message: Vukasin Toroman: "Re: [boost] Re: recursive mutex and condition"
Previous message: Michael Glassford: "[boost] Re: surprising accessability of free locking functions for mutex"
In reply to: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] [serialization] problem with boost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
Next in thread: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [serialization]problemwithboost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"
Reply: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [serialization]problemwithboost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view