From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 19:35:16
> > John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I take back "Accepted by default", since is a bit confusing, sorry for
> that.
>
> Here's what I mean:
> it's clear that people want such a library, and a lot of positive
> feedback was received. I know the library cannot be accepted at this time.
I think the review process is close to as good as it can practically
expected to be.
In this particular case, I think that to small things sort of clouded the
issue.
a) The reference to the "vote" which over emphasizes the "voting" aspect.
In the future I think it would be better to use the term "recommend"
b) the "Accepted by default",
I think this particular situation could have been handled better with
"the library is not accepted at this time"
reasons....
Robert Ramey