From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 13:27:36
John Torjo wrote:
> Francis ANDRE wrote:
>
>> I have asked to the owner of log4cpp if he would be interested in putting
>> log4cpp in the boost foundry (sandbox first for sure) with a change from
>> the LGPL licence to the boost one.
>>
>
> To me, log4cpp seems way too complex and just modeled after the Java way.
>
> Of course, this is just my very subjective oppinion ;)
>
I agree.