From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 02:28:34
Robert Ramey wrote:
> There is a confusion here. Check the manual section titled "Class
> Versioning"
>
> There should be something like:
>
> BOOST_CLASS_VERSION(Test_c, 99)
>
> in your code. I don't remember what the maximum class version might be but
> it could be small like 255 for binary archives.
>
I did ask about this in the previous e-mail. I thought non-primitive
types were, by default, versioned, i.e. if no BOOST_CLASS_VERSION is
specified, they have a version of 0. Is this not the case?
Anyway, the code I posted still gives odd results if I set
BOOST_CLASS_VERSION(Test_c, 0). Anything but 0 works, but zero gives
the effects described previously, a 3 on the way back in, which is your
archive version, not the class version.
Again, specifying no version works for text archives (haven't checked
binary) but not for XML.
Thanks
Russell