From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-09 17:07:21
On Oct 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Dave Harris wrote:
> The second is a container of values which may be polymorphic. It would
> be
> a more-or-less drop-in replacement for vector<T>. It would not allow
> nulls, and the syntax would be like v.begin()->method(). Although it
> would
> probably use pointers behind the scenes, that would be an
> implementation
> detail not revealed by its interface.
I.e. a vector<T&> ?
-Howard