From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 09:19:55
[Moving to the Boost list only]
On Sep 29, 2004, at 9:07 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> You'd regenerated the bison/flex output after 1.31.0, which has caused
>> both this problem and the regression noted by Jeffrey Holle on the
>> users list yesterday. Perhaps we should revert this directory to its
>> 1.31.0 state.
>
> It's not so easy :-( I've regenerated the files as part of this commit:
>
> 2004-01-26 12:16 vladimir_prus
>
> * graphviz_digraph_parser.cpp, graphviz_graph_parser.cpp,
> graphviz_parser.yy: Fix (or rather workaround) the bug which
> caused
> second reading of graphviz file to fail. Looks like the parser
> is
> not reenterant.
>
> Patch from anynymous user.
>
> so if we revert the files back, we'll introduce back a bug.
Argh!
> I've just
> regenerated the files again and Jeffrey's problem is gone. Guess we'd
> need to
> #define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
> to fix the other problem. I've added that to Jamfile and the files
> seems to
> still build.
>
> Should I commit the regenerated files and Jamfile changes?
Sure. Were you able to check it on VC 7.1?
>> We'll deprecate it in 1.32.0 (when, hopefully, we will
>> have a new GraphViz parser that works well) and remove it afterwards.
>
> How the new parser will be implemented?
Spirit. Granted, they've dropped support for older, broken compilers,
so someone will still be getting hurt by this.
Doug