From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 09:00:23
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:58:06PM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> "Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20040929104310.GY29008_at_lenin.felcer.sk...
> | On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> | >
>
> | > copy_range<string>( *it ) should do the work.
> | >
> |
> | Actualy I thought, that we may add a member function to the iterator range.
> | So that the syntax would be like:
> |
> | it->copy<string>();
>
> Inside a dependent type context this would be
>
> it-> template copy<string>();
>
> I think. besides, I don't like the idea of adding more stuff to
> iterator_range. The Pavol Droba I knew used to be a proponent of
> free-standing functions :-)
>
Oh yeah. That was probably just one of ideas that just popped up in my mind and
never should get out of it.
I was little bit misleaded by Gennadiy's effort to simplify the handling.
This is obviously not the way.
Regards,
Pavol.