From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 16:26:34
> > It basically your choice, but why wouldn't you. I keep repeating during
> > formal reviews that test programs could be enhanced here and there would
> you
> > use Boost.Test (and all it's tools).
> >
> I'd rather change it to use at least the minimal test framework, otherwise
I
> don't see how these results are interpreted.
> But then I don't know if there is someone expecting the particular format
of
> this result and parsing it. If that's the case, my "fix" will we
interpreted
> as a failure.
>
> Fernando Cacciola
> SciSoft
Boost.Test is safe bet in this regard. Test program output will definitely
be accepted and processed properly but Boost.Build.
Gennadiy.