From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-23 15:13:17
On 09/23/2004 02:35 PM, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
[snip]
> My point wasn't the concrete syntax, this is volatile at this stage anyway.
> My point was the concept to implement a library, which is 'dual' to Spirit,
> based on the idea, that a grammar describes all possible matchable input
> sequences, so why not use this 'grammar' to specify, how to generate this
> input sequences.
Also, couldn't these 'dual' libraries be used to generate test cases
for each other?