From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-16 16:32:28
Andreas Huber wrote:
> [...]
> Plus, Dave's convention
> has the advantage that only very few people need to change the names in
> the docs/books, etc. Personally, I would have preferred boost::fsm a lot
> over Boost.FSM but it's not *that* important, is it?
The convention I use is that when talking about the entire library, go
with Boost.LibraryName, and when talking about a specific component,
use boost::component_name. That's because there's times when I want to
talk about boost::bind() in particular, disregarding the other elements
in the Boost.Bind library, and Boost libraries often contain a type that
has the same name as the library, but also other types that one might
want to talk about individually.
Dave