Re: [boost] Dot in Boost Library Names?

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 12:00:17

At the risk of discussing the bicycle shed, what about using the
scope resolution operator?  That, at least, would not be
misconstrued by a copyeditor and would be in keeping with C++
syntax.

Should that be rejected soundly, here's my vote on the period:

                       Never: -1
Always Except Before Library: 0
                      Always: 1

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;