From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 14:31:47
My apologies - please, just forget what I've posted.
> no_overload_tag function( \
> BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_DEC(arity) \
> , any BOOST_PP_INTERCEPT)...); \
GCC allows this for binary operators (even in ansi mode), making me jump
to conclusions - couldn't find anything in the standard backing it.
Further I doubt there is a chance of weakening the "no-match-overload"
in any other way to match worse than a function with one user defined
conversion per argument.
Sorry for that !