From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 08:27:04
Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 05:42, David Abraham wrote:
>
>> If these are (supposedly) random access iterators, it's because the
>> ublas people aren't using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor to
>> define them.
>
> I think you hit the nail on the head there! Making this change is number one
> on the priority list. The base classes to do this are already partially in
> place. Just a little work is required to change the rest of the code!
>
> Michael
Michael,
please do not reply to digests. See
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/more/discussion_policy.htm#quoting
Thanks,
Dave
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com