From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 06:37:44
> Since I do not want to use -pedantic but not specify -Wno-longlong--I
> really do want the 'pedantic' warnings with unadorned extensions like
> long long warned--it is likely that I (and perhaps many other people who
> use GCC) will retain something like this patch locally if it is deemed
> inappropriate for Boost. This would be unfortunate.
How about something like:
BOOST_EXTENSION(x)
which expands to "__extension__ x" on gcc and "x" otherwise?
Then we can use BOOST_EXTENSION(long long) where necessary.
Thoughts?
John.