From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-13 17:33:15
Thorsten <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> In this particular case, I think you could make a good argument that
> these traits (for iterators and ranges) are really the same,
> semantically. Maybe that solves some problems?
>
> I'm not sure I see how. For example iterator traits don't have an iterator.
That's one reason we're not using degenerate traits blobs, but
metafunctions.
Isn't an iterator's value_type the same value_type a range or a
container has?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com