From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-06 14:07:49
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:49AM -0500, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>
> >Pavol Droba wrote:
> >
> >>BOOST_PP helps me a lot in here, however it is not crusial for the
> >>library.
> >>So if there is no other way to handle this I can rewrite the file to be
> >>without the preprocessor.
> >
> >It does help you.. It's saving a lot of typing in this case.
> >
> >>Are you sure, that there is no other way around?
> >
> >I'm about to try a last one... which is to replace the
> >BOOST_PP_SEQ_ENUM, with some form of BOOST_PP_ARRAY, and possible just a
> >custom ARGn set of macros.
>
> OK, figured out a fix, with slightly more typing at each test line, but
> it eliminates the use of BOOST_PP without eliminating the time saving
> TEST* macro.
>
> I checked in the changes, and I'm running a full set of tests now.
Great, I was thinking about a similar approach, just haven't time to
look at it more deeply.
Anyway, thanks for help.
Regards,
Pavol.