From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-23 07:32:00
I think it was discussed ages ago on these lists (but can't find the
messages now, probably when Bill was still around) about adding
scoped_unlock classes to complement scoped_lock classes?
Are there still plans to add these? My current use is nothing more than
unlock in the constructor, and lock again in the destructor.
Thanks
Russell