From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 17:46:46
Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The (proposed) move assignment philosophy is:
>
> l1 = move(l2);
>
> behaves as if:
>
> atomic
> {
> if (l1.locked())
> l1.unlock();
> if (l2.locked())
> {
> l2.unlock();
> l1.lock();
> }
> }
>
> So in your example l2 would be unlocked, l1 would remain locked, and
> the underlying mutex lock count would be decremented by 1.
weird; the mutex association is not transferred along with
"locked-ness"?
Uh-oh: I think I just invoked the locked-ness monster.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com