From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 07:47:29
John Maddock wrote:
>>I've put them here: http://genericprogramming.com/boost
>>
>>Failures:
>>- ublas (2)
>>- test (_many_)!!
>>- thread/test_read_write_mutex like on other compilers
>>- random(2)
>>- date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock -> should be expected???
>>
>>Furthermore some in range and serialization.
>
>
> That's not too good, the last release had a 100% pass rate for Intel, this
> one really should as well unless there are some really good reasons...
The read_write_mutex is new, so it's not a true regression from the
previous 100% pass rate. I'm currently working on the scheduling
algorithm to make it pass its unit tests and hopefully deal with
reported deadlocking issues.
Mike