[boost] Borland const/partial specialization weirdness?

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-16 15:51:10

I'm rather confused over the tuple_test_bench failure in Borland 5.6.4:
     
http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/developer/output/bin-boost-status-tuple_test_bench-test-borland-5-6-4-debug.html

Borland supports partial specialization, but I seem to remember some weirdness 
with its handling of cv-qualifiers in partial specializations. Does anyone 
know if this is the case, or how the weirdness goes?

        Doug