[boost] Re: [Boost.Thread] mutex Win32 implementation changes

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-15 15:55:09

Michael Glassford wrote:
[...]
> Looking at this again, it's not entirely clear to me what the return
> value of atomic<int>::swap() is. Can you clarify?

Old value. InterlockedExchange. Brrr.

regards,
alexander.