Boost mailing page: RE: [boost] min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-08 14:10:48

Next message: Max Khesin: "RE: [boost] FYI: Trolltech's new generic containers"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: Pretty Good Initialization Library"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Gregor: "[boost] min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"
Next in thread: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"
Reply: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"

Why subject configuration still failing on min/max according to Linux
regression?

Gennadiy.

Next message: Max Khesin: "RE: [boost] FYI: Trolltech's new generic containers"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: Pretty Good Initialization Library"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Gregor: "[boost] min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"
Next in thread: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"
Reply: Eric Niebler: "[boost] Re: min, max, GCC 2.95.3, and STLport"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view