From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-29 10:21:23
Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Right, so what we have (I think) are reasonably well-designed classes with
> incorrectly specified concepts. scoped_lock should really lock; try_lock
> should just try to lock.
I don't understand; are you addressing the concept problem above?
scoped_lock refers to a class, right?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com