From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-05 21:13:10
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> My current view is that Boost.Range should contain both itarator_range<> and range<>,
> but that range-based algorithms should use range<>
If I understand you correctly, it sounds a bit rigid. Would you not
provide a range-based lower_bound as a matter of principle, or what?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com