From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-27 11:53:16
David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
>
> Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:
>
> > Maybe I'm just being thick, but the whole idea of a failing exit action
seems
> > rather odd to me. This has nothing to do with whether the exit action is a
> > destructor or not. The state is trying to take a transition, it basically
has
> > done so, the transition action has run
>
> If exit actions happen after transition actions...
They don't. In any transition all exit actions are executed first, then the
transition action and finally all entry actions.
Regards,
Andreas