From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-11 02:03:21
Beman,
the attached patch enables the operator++(int) in directory_iterator.
To summarize our discussion with Dave:
1. New single pass iterator requirements did not meants to outlaw returning
proxy from operator++(int)
2. Even if proxy is automatically generated by iterator_facade, this might
take some time to be implemented. In fact, I no longer believe it's really
desired.
So, implementing operator++(int) is directory_iterator makes sense.
The attached patch basically uncomments your code, adds one using declaration
to bring preincrement operator++ into the scope and changes the tests.
Okay to commit?
- Volodya