From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-14 12:25:45
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Joaqu=EDn=20M=AA=20L=F3pez=20Mu=F1oz?= <joaquin_at_[hidden]>
> Thorsten Ottosen ha escrito:
> >
> > [...] index::list should be sufficient.
>
> Still, I don't like "list" alone. If an using directive is in affect, then
>
> using boost::multi_index;
>
> multi_index_container
> <
> employee,
> list<
> ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >,
> ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
> >
> >
>
> does not read so well, as it is not clear (IMHO) what list is supposed
> to be introducing. Compare with:
>
> multi_index_container
> <
> employee,
> index_list<
> ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >,
> ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
> >
> >
>
> What do you think?
Don't forget "indices" or "indexes" in lieu of "index_list."
multi_index_container
<
employee,
indices<
ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >,
ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
>
>
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;