Boost mailing page: [boost] Re: Re: [Threads] Much faster try

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-22 11:15:43

Next message: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: [config] Patch for Intel 8.0 + Dinkum lib"
Previous message: Janusz Piwowarski: "Re: [boost] [program_options] post-review version"
In reply to: Adal Chiriliuc: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Next in thread: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"

Adal Chiriliuc wrote:

> Wasn't event usage discouraged because it is unsafe?

That was semaphores.

-cd

Next message: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] Re: [config] Patch for Intel 8.0 + Dinkum lib"
Previous message: Janusz Piwowarski: "Re: [boost] [program_options] post-review version"
In reply to: Adal Chiriliuc: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Next in thread: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view