From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-21 14:52:42
"Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote:]
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> > If you're bothered by the extra character, how about just "mp"?
After
> > all, if it's part of boost, of course it must be a "library". On
> > second though, it must involve "programming", too, so why not just
> > "m"?
>
> Because it's too generic. mpl is sufficiently unique and restricts
> the library domain enough.
I forgot a smiley face. Too much typing ;-
Jonathan