From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-02 07:31:02
Daniel Krügler <dsp_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams schrieb:
>> Daniel Krügler <dsp_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>>According to Eric, we seem to have chance by taking advantage of the
>>>_MSC_EXTENSIONS flag - these are good news!
>>>
>>>Thank you for your thorough answers and your patience concerning my
>>>rashly conclusions,
>> Aleksey and I would be very grateful if you'd post a patch to
>> boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp that solves these problems.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>
> Sorry for my late answer, Dave. Actually I was not so sure whether
> your response was a kind of joke (due to my enthusiastic "[..] we seem
> to have chance by[..]") or not;-)
Not.
> But I took it as honest as possible and searched for the definition(s)
> of any of the definitions of those static "value" members declared in
> any of the (macro hidden) AUX_WRAPPER_NAME classes. Regrettably I didn't
> find any of these definitions in my 1.30.0 or in the last official
> 1.30.2 release. Can someone give me a pointer, where these definitions
> can be found?
I pointed you at the file above. Please use a CVS snapshot or the
release candidate for the basis of your patch 1.30.x is very
different.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com