From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-27 01:22:54
David Abrahams wrote:
> John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>
>>How about having the email' addresses of all the review managers on
>>the formal_review_process.html page? (and update this page as review
>>managers are added or deleted)
>>
>>The one making a review request will have to write an email to all of
>>the managers, and see which one is available. I don't think there
>>would be a problem if for a review request we would have multiple
>>review managers.
>
>
> I think we should:
>
> a. Make being a review manager or a moderator or a wizard one of the
> conditions of having a library in boost
>
> b. Use a regular rotating schedule for review managers. If you're
> not going to be available when your time comes up, it should be
> your responsibility to find someone to swap with.
From my experience strict rotating works almost never due to time
constraints or library topic.
I am unsure whether this is not too much pressure to put it on highly
skilled volunteers.
Thomas