From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-21 10:03:50
"Bronek Kozicki" <brok_at_[hidden]> wrote in message:
> > 2. move_ptr<T, kozicki> (the name needs work -- no offense Bronek
:-)
> > This would be (my version of) Bronek's pointer, with two pointers
> > extra overhead and essentially no runtime overhead.
>
> That's OK. But not to clutter source code with my name I prefer name
> "auto_storage" , as everything is inside pointer stack storage.
>
That's a good name -- I'll use it. (But don't change yours.)
Jonathan