[boost] Re: uniform_int doesn't meet its specification if min == max

From: Alan Stokes (alan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-15 10:05:55

Jens Maurer wrote:
> The current 1.31.0 release candidate handles the degenerate case
> gracefully.

Thanks, that's good news. I look forward to it.

>  The current CVS main branch even contains an additional
> test case in random_test.cpp, but I'm not going to forward this to
> the release branch (since we're only dealing with a test case
> here, the functionality was already present before).

I don't understand. What do you gain by not adding a valid test?

- Alan