From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-27 17:33:13
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Should these files in boost-root/libs/utility be removed? They appear
> to be old versions of files now in boost-root/libs/iterator/doc.
>
> 12/27/2003 08:29 AM 11,179 counting_iterator.htm
> 01/15/2002 02:14 PM 8,751 filter_iterator.htm
> 02/27/2001 12:50 AM 5,334 function_output_iterator.htm
> 11/11/2002 02:50 PM 4,214 generator_iterator.htm
> 10/01/2001 11:54 AM 15,975 indirect_iterator.htm
> 09/05/2002 10:05 AM 42,289 iterator_adaptors.htm
> 08/20/2001 09:04 AM 3,656 MultiPassInputIterator.html
> 12/28/2001 10:49 AM 6,759 permutation_iterator.htm
> 10/01/2001 11:54 AM 13,477 projection_iterator.htm
> 10/01/2001 11:54 AM 11,597 reverse_iterator.htm
> 08/11/2003 02:40 PM 11,191 shared_container_iterator.html
> 08/12/2002 04:47 PM 7,715 transform_iterator.htm
I wanted to leave those around long enough to steal material from them
for the new docs.
> What about these files in boost-root/libs/utility? They aren't
> referenced by the libs/iterator/test/Jamfile. Are they obsolete?
>
> 01/09/2002 08:15 AM 9,589 iterators_test.cpp
I believe this one is testing stuff provided by the operators
library. I don't know more about it than that.
> 08/11/2003 02:40 PM 1,045 shared_iterator_example1.cpp
> 12/26/2003 07:32 PM 1,190 shared_iterator_example2.cpp
> 08/11/2003 02:40 PM 1,140 shared_iterator_example3.cpp
> 08/11/2003 02:24 PM 1,281 shared_iterator_test.cpp
These are Ron Garcia's; I don't know a thing about them. If they're
not referenced in any Jamfile they should definitely go. But then,
boost/shared_container_iterator.hpp would have to go as well. Is
this a part of some library we accepted?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com