From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-18 03:58:20
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:07:38 -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
> This duplication is intentional and AFAIK harmless. It allows
Yes, I think that it's automatically resolved here:
Info: resolving __ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base14lower_case_mapE by linking to __imp___ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base14lower_case_mapE (auto-import)
Info: resolving __ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base9class_mapE by linking to __imp___ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base9class_mapE (auto-import)
Info: resolving __ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base10syntax_mapE by linking to __imp___ZN5boost9re_detail13c_traits_base10syntax_mapE (auto-import)
There are however 2 symbols which are not resolved:
d000000.o(.idata$2+0x0): multiple definition of `_head_boost_regex_mgw_mt_d_1_31_dll'
..\..\..\bin\boost\libs\regex\build\boost_regex.dll\mingw\debug\threading-multi\boost_regex-mgw-mt-d-1_31.lib(d000000.o)(.idata$2+0x0): first defined here
d000004.o(.idata$7+0x0): multiple definition of `boost_regex_mgw_mt_d_1_31_dll_iname'
..\..\..\bin\boost\libs\regex\build\boost_regex.dll\mingw\debug\threading-multi\boost_regex-mgw-mt-d-1_31.lib(d001673.o)(.idata$7+0x0): first defined here
(lines are not wrapped intentionally)
B.