From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-13 07:52:48
> An enum type is a compound type. I think it would be best to say
>
> "not a fundamental type"
>
> as this is what the implementation looks like (see also 3.9/1). I think
> the remark about "requires partial specialization" in the docs for
> is_compound might also be wrong now and should be fixed, too. John?
Yes, thanks, changed in the docs.
John.