From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 16:47:19
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:ubrqgfrwd.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> [SNIPPED]
>
> >>Actually on compilers where it's needed, it seems to be safe (and
> >>occasionally neccessary) to use it everywhere except in the place
> >>labelled OK above. We really ought to change it to BOOST_TYPENAME.
> >
Unfortunately, it's not that easy: bcc5.6.4 (but not 5.5.1) _requires_ it in
some places, while still ICEing at some deduced contexts.
Fernando Cacciola
SciSoft