From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-04 19:24:42
Vladimir Prus wrote:
>This can't be right ....
Fixed, thanks
>BTW, is there any way to check that base object is serialized. It would be
>nice if there were no way to bypass calling base' serilize, just like it is
>with constructors. I must admin I cannot think of any way how it can be done.
I don't think that serialization of the base class is always necessary
so I don't think it would be a good idea to require it. I don't see
and obvious way to do it either.
Robert Ramey