From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 11:50:02
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in
news:un0acfr3o.fsf_at_[hidden]:
> Sounds like an example of the former.
You are correct of course. Looks like I read the original message back-to-
front.
Would boost::function be an example of the latter? It is usable on
Borland/older MSVC with the deprecated functionX syntax, but the tr1
version is entirely unsupported.
[It would be quite nice to see these 2 separate implementations separated
out in the test pages, but I'm not sure what would be involved. Would it
be as simple as renaming a couple of tests?]
AlisdairM