From: Michael Hart (imsaicollector_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-20 22:19:58
> > some_range_type r(. . .);
> >
> > for(; r; ++r)
> > {
> > *r; // Do something with the current position
> > }
> >
Just to stick my two cents in why bother with a ++
operator in the for loop the increment is implied
so you could write something like the following
for (; r; )
{
*r;
}
increment and test makes more sense for a range object
within the of a loop. Right :-)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/