From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-13 03:54:49
David Abrahams wrote:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >> Misha Bergal <mbergal_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> > 2. The python test fail if run as a part of status/jamfile - runs fine
> >> > if ran from libs/python/test (see log below)
> >>
> >> Baffling.
> >
> > It's easy to reproduce - include Boost.Python into the status/jamfile, and
> > you'll get what we are getting. We would appreciate if somebody with
> > adequate amount of bjam knoweledge could look at this in more detail -
> > apparently we don't have enough qualification to understand what's
> > happenning there, and certainly not enough time to get ourselves to that
> > level.
>
> OK, this is now fixed.
Thank you!
> However, I'll have to get Boost.Python tests
> to use the primitives in tools/build/v1/testing.jam for running tests
> if you want process_jam_log to work on it.
We do! The ultimate goal is to have a report which would provide us with
complete status of all libraries, for all platforms the regressions are run
on.
Aleksey