From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-30 15:23:33
Hugo Duncan wrote:
> Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> This change does not preserve semantics.
Could you try again with numeric_limits<>?
The "enum" stuff that is in the CVS has been done
on purpose, so any Borland solution should be #ifdef'ed.
> Woops, did't spot that in the type_traits doc's, even though it is spelt
> out explicitly.
>
>> The current CVS already has slightly different code, could you
>> try this, please?
Sorry, I got mixed up here. CVS version 1.3 is the most current.
Jens Maurer