From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-27 14:11:33
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I've repeatedly suggested is_base_of<B, D> ("B is a base of D") and
> is_derived_from<D, B> ("D is derived from B") and repeatedly been
> ignored. ;-)
If I ignored you it's probably because this ignores the currying
issue.
is_base_of<D,B>
makes plenty of sense. When the "D" gets bound visually to
is_base_of, we have a predicate on "B" which asks "is it a base of D"?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com