From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-11 03:51:48
--- Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> I guess if it weren't special, it won't get the qualification
> "singular" or "unspecified value".
There is no such a thing as "qualification". Both are just
instances of a data type.
[...]
> if they care, then they care about the arguments they get, especially
> about the singular ones. Their functions aren't going to be safe just
> because they refuse to recognize that some arguments are singular.
I am sorry, I said that "If any of these can happen,
he should handle it in his f() function".
I meant that f(...) *has* to recognize 'singular' arguments.
Eugene
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com