From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-30 06:00:17
At 10:26 2003-09-29, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>Howard Hinnant wrote:
>[...]
> > Your second suggestion looks good too.
>
>FWIW, everything that was posted thus far in this thread is totally
>broken stuff, AFAICS.
How is it broken?
>I won't go into details here.
Why not?
>Feel free to {re-} post it to c.p.t.
I don't even know what that means.
--- Daniel Wallin