From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-26 09:21:29
David Abrahams wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > Dave A. should better fix the C++ std instead of hacking with MS SEH.
> >
> >> 5. What would be an ideal behavior?
> >
> > A) WG21 mandates 2-phase EH
>
> Please don't go around announcing what I "should better fix" at least
> until you've written a real proposal for whatever you think is better
> than the status quo. Trying to convince the world that _I_ should be
> responsible for pushing some idea I don't even understand
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You do. At this point. I'm pretty sure. C'mon, it's time to concede.
> through the
> committee without being willing to carefully explain it and defend its
> superiority is truly despicable.
Maybe. I see it as kinda "cheap outsourcing". ;-)
regards,
alexander.
P.S. Dave, BTW, ("somewhat" related to exceptions business)
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06116.html
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06118.html
(Subject: New cancelation points -- "compatibility" issue?)
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/austin-group-l/msg06126.html
(see "XSH ERN 76...")