From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-18 15:29:12
"Smith, Devin" <DSMITH_at_[hidden]> writes:
> * I recommend the following:
>
> - Use the following text to refer to the license:
>
> Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software
> License Version 1.0.
Use, modification and distribution is subject to Version 1.0 of
the Boost Software License
sounds more natural. Is that OK?
> - Include a copy of each version of the Boost license in use by a
> shipping library in the Boost distribution. The version number
> should be identifiable both from the license file's name and its
> contents
>
> - Optionally add a URL to *stable* license text, e.g.
>
> Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software
> License Version 1.0 (http://boost.org/LICENSE-1.0).
OK, I guess the only other question is, do we want to include a URL?
Is there any advantage?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com